1. Greenwood DN, Lippman JR. Gender and media: Content, uses, and impact. In: Chrisler JC, McCreary
DR, editors. Handbook of gender research in psychology, Vol. 2: Gender research in social and applied
psychology. New York: Springer; 2010. pp. 643–669.
2. Coltrane S, Messineo M. The perpetuation of subtle prejudice: Race and gender imagery in 1990s tele-
vision advertising. Sex Roles. 2000; 42: 363–389.
3. McArthur LZ, Resko BG. The portrayal of men and women in American television commercials. The J
Soc Psychol. 1975; 97: 209–220.
4. Aubrey JS, Harrison K. The gender-role content of children’s favorite television programs and its links
to their gender-related perceptions. Media Psychol. 2004; 6: 111–146.
5. Plous S, Neptune D. Racial and gender biases in magazine advertising. Psychol Women Q. 1997; 21:
627–644.
6. Glascock J, Preston-Schreck C. Gender and racial stereotypes in daily newspaper comics: A time-hon-
ored tradition? Sex Roles. 2004; 51: 423–431.
7. Fredrickson BL, Roberts T-A. Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences
and mental health risks. Psychol Women Q. 1997; 21: 173–206.
8. Groesz LM, Levine MP, Murnen SK. The effect of experimental presentation of thin media images on
body satisfaction: A meta-analytic review. Int J Eat Disord. 2002; 31: 1–16. PMID: 11835293
9. Goffman E. Gender advertisements. New York: Harper & Row; 1976.
10. Kenix LJ. Alternative and mainstream media. 1st ed. New York: Bloomsbury Academic; 2011.
11. Archer D, Iritani B, Kimes DD, Barrios M. Face-ism: Five studies of sex differences in facial prominence.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1983; 45: 725–735.
12. Hall CCI, Crum MJ. Women and “body-ism” in television beer commercials. Sex Roles. 1994; 31: 329–
337.
13. Copeland GA. Face-ism and primetime television. J Broadcast Electron Media. 1989; 33: 209–214.
14. Konrath S, Au J, Ramsey LR. Cultural differences in face-ism: Male politicians have bigger heads in
more gender-equal cultures. Psychol Women Q. 2012; 36: 476–487.
15. Konrath SH, Schwarz N. Do male politicians have big heads? Face-ism in online self-representations
of politicians. Media Psychol. 2007; 10: 436–448.
16. Szillis U, Stahlberg D. The face-ism effect in the Internet: Differences in facial prominence of women
and men. Int J Internet Sci. 2007; 2: 3–11.
17. Loughnan S, Haslam N, Murnane T, Vaes J, Reynolds C, Suitner C. Objectification leads to deperson-
alization: The denial of mind and moral concern to objectified others. Eur J Soc Psychol. 2010; 40:
709–717.
18. Levesque MJ, Lowe CA. Face-ism as a determinant of interpersonal perceptions: The influence of con-
text on facial prominence effects. Sex Roles. 1999; 41: 241–259.
19. Zuckerman M. On the meaning and implications of facial prominence. J Nonverbal Behav. 1986; 10:
215–229.
20. Schwarz N, Kurz E. What’s in a picture? The impact of face-ism on trait attribution. Eur J Soc Psychol.
1989; 19: 311–316.
21. Matthews JL. Hidden sexism: Facial prominence and its connections to gender and occupational status
in popular print media. Sex Roles. 2007; 57: 515–525.
22. Melkote K, Melkote S. Face-ism as a media stereotype: A case study of the Newsweek magazine. In:
Hinnen MB, editor. The interrelationship of business and communication. New York: Peter Lang;
2010. pp. 213–227.
23. Reichart Smith L. Up against the boards: An analysis of the visual production of the 2010 Olympic ice
hockey games. Commun & Sport. 2016; 4: 62–81.
24. Lanzieri N, Cook BJ. Examination of muscularity and body-fat depictions in magazines that target het-
erosexual and gay men. Body Image. 2013; 10: 251–254. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2012.12.003 PMID:
23352323
25. Gonsoulin ME. Liberated and inclusive? An analysis of self-representation in a popular lesbian maga-
zine. J Homosex. 2010; 57: 1158–1173. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2010.508327 PMID: 20924928
26. Saucier JA, Caron SL. An investigation of content and media images in gay men’s magazines. J Homo-
sex. 2008; 55: 504–523. doi: 10.1080/00918360802345297 PMID: 19042283
27. Milillo D. Sexuality sells: A content analysis of lesbian and heterosexual women’s bodies in magazine
advertisements. J Lesbian Stud. 2008; 12: 381–392. doi: 10.1080/10894160802278267 PMID:
19042746
28. Kite ME, Deaux K. Gender belief systems: Homosexuality and the implicit inversion theory. Psychol
Women Q. 1987; 11: 83–96.
29. Reichart Smith L, Cooley SC. International faces: An analysis of self-inflicted face-ism in online profile
pictures. J Intercult Commun Res. 2012; 41: 279–296.
30. Kapidzic S, Martins N. Mirroring the media: The relationship between media consumption, media inter-
nalization, and profile picture characteristics on Facebook. J Broadcast Electron Media. 2015; 59:
278–297.
31. Mulvey L. Visual pleasure and narrative cinema. In: Durham MG, Kellner DM, editors. Media and cul-
tural studies: Key works. Malden, MA: Blackwell; 2006. pp. 342–352.
32. Eaton AW. Feminist philosophy of art. Philos Compass. 2008; 3: 873–893.
33. Zuckerman M, Kieffer SC. Race differences in face-ism: Does facial prominence imply dominance? J
Pers Soc Psychol. 1994; 66: 86–92.
34. Mastro DE, Stern SR. Representations of race in television commercials: A content analysis of prime-
time advertising. J Broadcast Electron Media. 2003; 47: 638–647.
35. Signorielli N. Aging on television: Messages relating to gender, race, and occupation in prime time. J
Broadcast Electron Media. 2004; 48: 279–301.
No comments:
Post a Comment